Comments on: Site updates http://blog.networthiq.com/2006/03/17/site-updates/ Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:59:36 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Anonymous http://blog.networthiq.com/2006/03/17/site-updates/#comment-76 Anonymous Sun, 02 Jul 2006 17:28:00 +0000 http://blog.networthiq.com/?p=58#comment-76 Another nice feature would be to add capabilty to compare to common financial indexes like the S&P 500, DJIA, NASDAQ Composite, etc. Another nice feature would be to add capabilty to compare to common financial indexes like the S&P 500, DJIA, NASDAQ Composite, etc.

]]> By: Anonymous http://blog.networthiq.com/2006/03/17/site-updates/#comment-75 Anonymous Mon, 17 Apr 2006 08:22:00 +0000 http://blog.networthiq.com/?p=58#comment-75 One feature I'd love to see is to be able to do comparisons using a data set that excludes the top 10% of net worth profiles. Multi-million dollar profiles skew the medians and averages dramatically, and quite frankly, those multi-million profiles don't represent any kind of useful comparison for the majority of people; indeed, because they skew results, they invalidate comparisons for the vast majority of users. Custom comparisons using ranges would in fact be more useful than the canned comparisons. One feature I’d love to see is to be able to do comparisons using a data set that excludes the top 10% of net worth profiles.

Multi-million dollar profiles skew the medians and averages dramatically, and quite frankly, those multi-million profiles don’t represent any kind of useful comparison for the majority of people; indeed, because they skew results, they invalidate comparisons for the vast majority of users.

Custom comparisons using ranges would in fact be more useful than the canned comparisons.

]]>