Come explore NetworthIQ

One of the things missing from NetworthIQ was the ability to see the highlights of what’s happening on the site. The new and popular users are on the home page, but there’s a lot of other interesting things to keep track of. So, today we released the explore section of the site. Along with the new and popular users, it features:

In addition, the Net Worth Statistics have been updated through the end of December and made part of the explore section for easy access.

What else do you think would be interesting to see?

3 Responses to “Come explore NetworthIQ”

  1. Neo Says:

    These are greats stats to be checking out. Thanks for putting them together. I wasn’t trying to be on the “Top Losses” category but now I have something to work on.

    Neo

  2. Hazzard Says:

    How about a feature that lets a User customize their view when logged in.

    I’m thinking that it would be neat to be able to create a view that shows me all the public users in NWIQ that I’d like to see. Then I wouldn’t have to search all over to put up a list of PF Blogger net worths.
    Hazzard

    http://www.everybodylovesyourmoney.com

  3. Ryan Williams Says:

    Thanks Neo. I’m sure you’ll be in the top gains list in no time.

    Hey Hazzard, good to read you again here. That’s an interesting thought, as always you’re right in our heads. I’m working on tagging now which will hopefully be the solution to your request. Users will be able to tag their profile, similar to delicious and flickr, then we can show all users with that tag as we do for the current demographic groups. If you can get all of the other pf’ers to track here and use a “pf” tag or something, you’ll be set :-).

    This is what we had in mind when we mention “special group” in the track description on the home page. We’ve just been a bit slow in implementing this.

    It does require action by someone else though. I’ll think about what it would take for a user to tag other users for their own tracking purposes, which is probably closer to what you had in mind?

Leave a Reply